Stephen Hahn <sch at sun.com> writes: > * Alan Burlison <Alan.Burlison at sun.com> [2007-12-04 19:09]: >> Stephen Hahn wrote: >> >> >>We also have the issue of who actually grants commit rights - is this >> >>going to be by a central body, or are the GCs and projects that make up >> >>ON going to manage their own committers? >> > >> > Both. I've been warning projects that seek to integrate into a >> > consolidation that they need to ensure that they have SCAs in place >> > for non-Sun employees. Cleaning this up further, as you and Rich have >> > mentioned earlier in the thread, so that various transitions are >> > covered correctly seems great. Helping the project and consolidation >> > leads in filtering for valid SCA-possessing individuals sounds very >> > valuable. >> >> That's not exactly what I meant, what I was asking was if a person has >> commit rights on a project that delivers to ON, do they automatically >> get ON commit rights, or do they explicitly need to be granted ON commit >> rights in addition to their project-level rights? > > The latter. >
Am I understanding correctly that any project committer must *also* have permissions to ON, in your opinion? That seems wrong to me, on several levels. If I understand that correctly, let me ask the obvious question. Why? -- Rich (in the hopes mail actually works now.)
