>>>>> "Alan" == Alan Burlison <Alan.Burlison at sun.com> writes:
Alan> That's not exactly what I meant, what I was asking was if a person Alan> has commit rights on a project that delivers to ON, do they Alan> automatically get ON commit rights, or do they explicitly need to be Alan> granted ON commit rights in addition to their project-level rights? sch> The latter. Alan> Yes, that's was what I thought you'd say, just checking :-) That Alan> would seem to be the most easily managed option, in that all the Alan> ON committers would be easily identifiable, and could be managed Alan> from one place. I'm not sure I understand. Are you saying that someone would have to get ON commit privileges in order to get commit privileges to a project? Or just that the two sets of privileges are managed separately? mike
