Mike Kupfer <mike.kupfer at sun.com> writes: > I can't remember if this got discussed on the project list or on IRC. A > quick check in the list archives didn't turn up anything, so... > > Rich and I (and I imagine Ken, too) continue to bump into the question > of how we will implement onnv-clone and the per-build snapshots. We > could continue the Teamware practice of using a separate repository, or > we could theoretically use tags (with branches being needed for the > per-build snapshots when there is a respin).
That's what I'd prefer. > Given where we are in the project, I think we need to resolve this > question and move forward. And since we understand how to make > everything work with separate repos, and we don't really have time to > experiment with the tags approach, I think we should go with separate > repositories for the clone and for the build snapshots. The problem is less the tags, than the branches for snapshots, for what it's worth. > If you've got questions or concerns, now would be a good time to speak > up. ;-) My only concern is to make sure the SCM hosting infrastructure will be in place to make sure that all of the clone, the build snapshots, and any other similar tree are on opensolaris.org. -- Rich