David Bustos <David.Bustos at sun.com> writes: > Quoth Mike Kupfer on Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 02:33:50PM -0800: >> Rich and I (and I imagine Ken, too) continue to bump into the question >> of how we will implement onnv-clone and the per-build snapshots. We >> could continue the Teamware practice of using a separate repository, or >> we could theoretically use tags (with branches being needed for the >> per-build snapshots when there is a respin). >> >> Given where we are in the project, I think we need to resolve this >> question and move forward. And since we understand how to make >> everything work with separate repos, and we don't really have time to >> experiment with the tags approach, I think we should go with separate >> repositories for the clone and for the build snapshots. > > Does separate repositories mean that you won't tag the biweekly builds? > I think that would be a shame.
The tags at build close are fairly useful in and of themselves, I think they're two separate issues. -- Rich
