Mike Kupfer wrote: > Slides 3, 10: I'm not a fan of random artwork unless there's some > relevance to the material on the slide. It's okay to just leave the > space blank. (Slide 13, OTOH, is great.)
They are supposed to be mercury and cadmium; but perhaps that isn't obvious. :) I can take 'em out if people want. I just had some blank space to fill and thought it might be neat. > Slide 6: I would change the access control bullet to "Different access > control model", since I think that's the high-order bit. For this > bullet, I was thinking about discussing > - access control for repos on opensolaris.org (use anon for read-only > access; repo owner uses webapp to grant commit privilege) > - access control for local repos (??? - do we need to recommend > something here?) Sounds good. > Slide 8: be careful about equating push/pull with putback/bringover. > Even with the bullet about the working directory not getting updated, I > expect there to be confusion about it. Maybe change 'i.e. a "putback"' > to 'roughly same as putback' (and a similar change for pull)? Sure. Thanks. cheers, steve -- stephen lau // stevel at sun.com | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net opensolaris // solaris kernel development
