On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 07:48 -0400, Richard Lowe wrote:
> Talking to Darren just now, it occurred to me that populating the
> initial gate access lists is non-trivial, and this is probably
> something we should start thinking about, at least for SFW (though
> it's probably easier for them than ON).
if by "access list" you mean the set of people allowed to change the
state of the gate, shouldn't the access list really be the union of:
- the gatekeepers
- the set of people with approved RTI's?
- Bill
