Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld at sun.com> writes: > On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 07:48 -0400, Richard Lowe wrote: >> Talking to Darren just now, it occurred to me that populating the >> initial gate access lists is non-trivial, and this is probably >> something we should start thinking about, at least for SFW (though >> it's probably easier for them than ON). > > if by "access list" you mean the set of people allowed to change the > state of the gate, shouldn't the access list really be the union of: > - the gatekeepers > - the set of people with approved RTI's?
When the gate moves to opensolaris.org, the RTI system and the gate cease being able to communicate in any way shape or form (hg.opensolaris.org is not on SWAN). However, when that can be rectified, that's an idea I really like, and should certainly be implemented. All assuming I should read it literally, as in "You may only putback iff you have one or more already-approved RTIs". -- Rich
