Bill Sommerfeld wrote: > On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 17:06 +0000, Stacey Jonathan Marshall wrote: > > >> Eek, your telling it to ignore everything? >> > > That's the default in the ON gate because it's impossible to build an > accurate .hgignore for ON which doesn't cripple hg performance. > > So it is, how very strange that is after reading hgignore(5). >> I think that might be the issue here. >> > > It's not; files listed in .hgignore which are under hg control should > still be treated as if they aren't ignored. > I guess Mark and I stand corrected. Sorry. > These files are not new files (they've been in the gate for years). > Got it. hgignore only causes non-added files to be ignored. > Somehow hg has found itself in an inconsistent state where it thinks > that they aren't under hg control any more. > How very peculiar.
Stace > - Bill > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > scm-migration-dev mailing list > scm-migration-dev at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/scm-migration-dev >
