Richard Lowe writes:
> James Carlson <james.d.carlson at sun.com> writes:
> > I've added hg_trans to it.  We don't have a keyword for "not just
> > related to transition, but may block it," do we?
> 
> I believe that was a combination of hg_trans and priority (or
> severity?), but may be wrong.  I don't think there's a separate
> keyword, no.

OK; no problem.  I was just checking that I hadn't missed anything.

> > (Fortunately, this script is used only by the team that updates the
> > ACPICA code from Intel, so they get to live with it.  But the move to
> > Mercurial will break them until the script is redone.)
> 
> Do we have a similar bug against the machinery used to maintain
> cmd/perl?  If not, we probably should.

I searched, and there isn't one.  But I also don't see anything under
cmd/perl that appears to be related to upgrade -- or I just don't
understand what's there.  If you're talking about copy_contrib, I
don't think that's similar, and (unlike this ACPICA thing) it seems to
deal with non-SCCS workspaces already.

> (perhaps it's worth another pass through looking for such things, or
> is that how you found the problem at hand?)

I grepped over the source base for instances of 'hg root' and
'workspace name', because I was interested in making sure that my new
which_scm script was invoked in all the places it was needed.

-- 
James Carlson, Solaris Networking              <james.d.carlson at sun.com>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive        71.232W   Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757   42.496N   Fax +1 781 442 1677

Reply via email to