Richard Lowe writes: > James Carlson <james.d.carlson at sun.com> writes: > > I've added hg_trans to it. We don't have a keyword for "not just > > related to transition, but may block it," do we? > > I believe that was a combination of hg_trans and priority (or > severity?), but may be wrong. I don't think there's a separate > keyword, no.
OK; no problem. I was just checking that I hadn't missed anything. > > (Fortunately, this script is used only by the team that updates the > > ACPICA code from Intel, so they get to live with it. But the move to > > Mercurial will break them until the script is redone.) > > Do we have a similar bug against the machinery used to maintain > cmd/perl? If not, we probably should. I searched, and there isn't one. But I also don't see anything under cmd/perl that appears to be related to upgrade -- or I just don't understand what's there. If you're talking about copy_contrib, I don't think that's similar, and (unlike this ACPICA thing) it seems to deal with non-SCCS workspaces already. > (perhaps it's worth another pass through looking for such things, or > is that how you found the problem at hand?) I grepped over the source base for instances of 'hg root' and 'workspace name', because I was interested in making sure that my new which_scm script was invoked in all the places it was needed. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677