James Carlson <james.d.carlson at sun.com> writes: > Richard Lowe writes: >> James Carlson <james.d.carlson at sun.com> writes: >> > I've added hg_trans to it. We don't have a keyword for "not just >> > related to transition, but may block it," do we? >> >> I believe that was a combination of hg_trans and priority (or >> severity?), but may be wrong. I don't think there's a separate >> keyword, no. > > OK; no problem. I was just checking that I hadn't missed anything. > >> > (Fortunately, this script is used only by the team that updates the >> > ACPICA code from Intel, so they get to live with it. But the move to >> > Mercurial will break them until the script is redone.) >> >> Do we have a similar bug against the machinery used to maintain >> cmd/perl? If not, we probably should. > > I searched, and there isn't one. But I also don't see anything under > cmd/perl that appears to be related to upgrade -- or I just don't > understand what's there. If you're talking about copy_contrib, I > don't think that's similar, and (unlike this ACPICA thing) it seems to > deal with non-SCCS workspaces already.
cmd/perl/5.8.4/utils/port and cmd/perl/5.6.1/utils/port, which from memory don't contain the same stuff. -- Rich
