* Eric Schrock <eric.schrock at sun.com> [2008-12-17 19:08]: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:33:03AM -0800, Stephen Hahn wrote: > > > > It's different than it was, but I'm not sure it's more complicated. > > In the interest of giving Mark source material, here's what I've done > > a few times now. > > Having just gone through this, I don't agree at all - if you want > anything close to the ON gate.
That's fair; my recent work has been loosely coupled (as has Dave's, which drove my response). > [Horror story elided.] I don't want to take the alias off in a strange direction, but I would very much appreciate seeing the mail you've accumulated in debugging this. A couple of the items you mention are surprising, and suggest problems in some of the integration choices, but I'd like to see the details. - Stephen -- sch at sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
