>>>>> "mike_s" == Mike Sullivan <Mike.Sullivan at sun.com> writes:
mike_s> I asked for it to be created for when we transitioned, not for mike_s> testing things now. Ah, sorry, I misunderstood. I've turned off delivery to the log alias for now. mike_s> I assumed any email-sending hooks would just send mail to some mike_s> other alias or to the tester - why does it need to go to the mike_s> official alias? I guess it doesn't, really. It just seemed like a convenient, low-overhead approach. The existing ON hooks use the admin database on opensolaris.org to determine where to send notification email. I'm assuming we'll want to structure the new hooks the same way, though I expect there to be some temporary debug infrastructure (i.e., as long as the test gate is on an internal box). At any rate, we could send notifications to another alias pretty easily. I'd like to use a Mailman alias for testing, in case there are Mailman configuration issues that we need to iron out before going live. Looking some more at the Mailman admin interface, I don't see an easy way to selectively delete test archives. So maybe it'd be better not to use sfwnv-notify after all. We're not currently using scm-migration-notify. Anyone object to using that for testing? mike
