Mike Kupfer <mike.kupfer at sun.com> writes: >>>>>> "mike_s" == Mike Sullivan <Mike.Sullivan at sun.com> writes: > > mike_s> I asked for it to be created for when we transitioned, not for > mike_s> testing things now. > > Ah, sorry, I misunderstood. > > I've turned off delivery to the log alias for now. > > mike_s> I assumed any email-sending hooks would just send mail to some > mike_s> other alias or to the tester - why does it need to go to the > mike_s> official alias? > > I guess it doesn't, really. It just seemed like a convenient, > low-overhead approach. > > The existing ON hooks use the admin database on opensolaris.org to > determine where to send notification email. I'm assuming we'll want to > structure the new hooks the same way, though I expect there to be some > temporary debug infrastructure (i.e., as long as the test gate is on an > internal box). > > At any rate, we could send notifications to another alias pretty easily. > I'd like to use a Mailman alias for testing, in case there are Mailman > configuration issues that we need to iron out before going live. > Looking some more at the Mailman admin interface, I don't see an easy > way to selectively delete test archives. So maybe it'd be better not to > use sfwnv-notify after all. > > We're not currently using scm-migration-notify. Anyone object to using > that for testing?
I'm fine with it. While you're there, can we lose the other aliases we have but don't need, they're just spam magnets. (we apparently have/had an scm-migration-discuss, who knew?) -- Rich
