Mike Kupfer <mike.kupfer at sun.com> writes: > [adding scm-migration-dev] > > For the scm-migration-dev folks, we've been discussing how the checks > should handle workspaces that have multiple outgoing changesets... > >>>>>> "Rich" == Richard Lowe <richlowe at richlowe.net> writes: > > Rich> However, if we default to checking each changeset individually, we > Rich> run into people (like me) who run pbchk and nits often, and see > Rich> warnings from changeset N-1 about problems fixed in N. Which is > Rich> just as bad. > > Perhaps this should be a semantic difference between "nits" and "pbchk". > "nits" could do the checks as of the final changeset, and "pbchk" could > check each changeset. >
Wouldn't the difference between what wx does in those situations and what that would do only add to the confusion? -- Rich
