>>>>> "Rich" == Richard Lowe <richlowe at richlowe.net> writes:
Rich> However, if we default to checking each changeset individually, we Rich> run into people (like me) who run pbchk and nits often, and see Rich> warnings from changeset N-1 about problems fixed in N. Which is Rich> just as bad. Mike> Perhaps this should be a semantic difference between "nits" and Mike> "pbchk". "nits" could do the checks as of the final changeset, and Mike> "pbchk" could check each changeset. Rich> Wouldn't the difference between what wx does in those situations Rich> and what that would do only add to the confusion? Maybe. That's why I said "perhaps". ;-) mike
