Richard Lowe wrote: > Stephen Lau wrote: >> Richard Lowe wrote: >>> [replying to myself, sorry] >>> >>> Richard Lowe wrote: >>>> Bonnie Corwin wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Am I reading this right that removing SCCS keywords causes a >>>>> problem for BFU? If so, does getting BFU in sync w/ Mercurial work >>>>> need to go on the SCM task list? >>>>> >>>> >>>> If Juergen is right in his evaluation, the root cause here is >>>> elfsign being an evil closed crock. >>>> >>>> Sadly, that's not fixable, apparently. I think all we can do here >>>> is flag-day all the crypto on integration, or pull keywords out of >>>> the certifications prematurely (and flag-day all the crypto now). >>> >>> ^- certificates, obviously. >>> >>> I'm personally leaning toward the latter, anything else as a >>> workaround for us non-Sun people would just be a nasty hack to get us >>> through, flushing them now seems reasonable, but I believe would need >>> a real exemption from the C-Team (?) since they'd no longer follow >>> the keyword rules. >> >> I'd rather do the latter and pull out the keywords now. We have to do >> it eventually anyway, and it's better than an ugly kludge in the interm. > > To close the loop. The appropriate people say that this is what they > are doing, that's pretty much all they say, but it's what they say. > > CR 6549126: elfsign text-format trust roots need to be un-CDDLed, un-SCMed > > I'm assuming "un-SCMed" means the keywords.
lol. Maybe they mean 'wx rm' ;-) I hadn't even thought about that interpretation. -steve -- stephen lau // stevel at sun.com | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net opensolaris // solaris kernel development