Richard Lowe wrote:
> Stephen Lau wrote:
>> Richard Lowe wrote:
>>> [replying to myself, sorry]
>>>
>>> Richard Lowe wrote:
>>>> Bonnie Corwin wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am I reading this right that removing SCCS keywords causes a 
>>>>> problem for BFU?  If so, does getting BFU in sync w/ Mercurial work 
>>>>> need to go on the SCM task list?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If Juergen is right in his evaluation, the root cause here is 
>>>> elfsign being an evil closed crock.
>>>>
>>>> Sadly, that's not fixable, apparently.  I think all we can do here 
>>>> is flag-day all the crypto on integration, or pull keywords out of 
>>>> the certifications prematurely (and flag-day all the crypto now).
>>>
>>> ^- certificates, obviously.
>>>
>>> I'm personally leaning toward the latter, anything else as a 
>>> workaround for us non-Sun people would just be a nasty hack to get us 
>>> through, flushing them now seems reasonable, but I believe would need 
>>> a real exemption from the C-Team (?) since they'd no longer follow 
>>> the keyword rules.
>>
>> I'd rather do the latter and pull out the keywords now.  We have to do 
>> it eventually anyway, and it's better than an ugly kludge in the interm.
> 
> To close the loop.  The appropriate people say that this is what they 
> are doing, that's pretty much all they say, but it's what they say.
> 
> CR 6549126: elfsign text-format trust roots need to be un-CDDLed, un-SCMed
> 
> I'm assuming "un-SCMed" means the keywords.

lol.  Maybe they mean 'wx rm' ;-)
I hadn't even thought about that interpretation.

-steve

-- 
stephen lau // stevel at sun.com | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development

Reply via email to