Kristis Makris wrote: > I'll create an account for you, Gunnar. Thanks. :)
> What will be the convention ? What is the property name ? It could be > implemented using a property, but there's no standard for it yet by > Subversion. When one is put in place, we could implement it, sure. The > problem, especially in Subversions case, is that some repository > configuration information (like a product name), can't be specified in > "the best possible way" yet. See > http://bugzilla.mkgnu.net/show_bug.cgi?id=876 That's why it shouldn't be possible in one single way but flexible. For example, with 0.18.3 it's possible to obtain the product name from the path. Using a property would just be another way. IMHO would it be the 'cooler' way because this allows you to restructure the repository as you wish without changing SCMBUG configuration files. :) As for the standards question... if there isn't one why not use your own? IMHO there doesn't need a standard for this. The property name could be a configuration option as well. :) Cu, Gunnar -- Gunnar Wagenknecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wagenknecht.org/ _______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
