On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 19:31 +0100, Gunnar Wagenknecht wrote: > That's why it shouldn't be possible in one single way but flexible. For > example, with 0.18.3 it's possible to obtain the product name from the > path. Using a property would just be another way. IMHO would it be the > 'cooler' way because this allows you to restructure the repository as > you wish without changing SCMBUG configuration files. :) > > As for the standards question... if there isn't one why not use your > own? IMHO there doesn't need a standard for this. The property name > could be a configuration option as well. :)
I can't disagree. I would go for reading the name of the product name from a configuration file inside the repository. The reason is that if one checks out a directory that doesn't have this property, the product name would be unavailable. _______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
