On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 09:20 -0600, Dale King wrote: > Even better than having configuration for this one feature, just make > the entire message configurable so you can say something like: > > bug-comment-format = > "%LOGMESSAGE% > > http://myserver/viewvc/svn?view=rev&revision=%NEWREV% > > %CHANGES%" > > You can define various tokens than can be used, e.g. %USER%, %DATE%, > %PREVIOUSREV% > > But is this compatible with CVS? Actually how does scmbug work with CVS? > Does it do a separate comment for each file committed? How else do you > know how to group the files into one comment? If it does a separate > comment for each file than perhaps this is still compatible.
No, it does a single comment for all files in "the same directory". CVS triggers its hooks per directory. But what you propose is possible for Subversion and CVS. Perhaps you won't supply: bug-comment-format = "%LOGMESSAGE% http://myserver/viewvc/svn?view=rev&revision=%NEWREV% %CHANGES%" but instead supply: bug-comment-format = "%LOGMESSAGE% %CHANGES% %CHANGES_WITH_URL%" bug-comment-viewscm-url="http://myserver/viewvc/svn?view=%FILE%revision= %NEWREV%" since %CHANGES_WITH_URL% will unroll to something like: http://myserver/viewvc/svn?view=system/doc/manual/about.sgml&revision=1.8 http://myserver/viewvc/svn?view=system/doc/manual/bugtracking-backends.sgml&revision=1.8 http://myserver/viewvc/svn?view=system/doc/manual/conventions.sgml&revision=1.1 while %CHANGES% will unroll to: 1.7 --> 1.8 Scmbug:system/doc/manual/about.sgml 1.7 --> 1.8 Scmbug:system/doc/manual/bugtracking-backends.sgml NONE --> 1.1 Scmbug:system/doc/manual/conventions.sgml It's not as visually appealing, but certainly possible. > -----Original Message----- > From: Kristis Makris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 11:01 AM > To: Dale King > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [scmbug-users] Add configuration for format of > thecommitmessage added to bug system > > On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 08:17 -0600, Dale King wrote: > > So you are you saying that Bugzilla does not support putting links at > > all in the comments? That doesn't seem to be true based on the > comments > > that have links in them in the bugs you refer to. > > No. Bugzilla supports putting links. But it will always list links as > "http://..."; Instead of listing them in blue color as "rev 1031". We are > trying to built something more usable and visually appealing. > > This is explained in more detail in: > > http://bugzilla.mkgnu.net/show_bug.cgi?id=266#c5 > > > Or is it that it will not support certain types of links like where > the > > link text is something other than the target. > > > > It seems you are trying to keep the list of file changes and have > parts > > of that text be links. I don't really care about that. I would be more > > than happy with: > > > > This is a log message. Changed the frobnoozle. > > > > http://myserver/viewvc/svn?view=rev&revision=1234 > > > > I don't care if the list of changes is in the comment, you can get > that > > from the link. But you could leave the list; just leave it as plain > > text. > > I see your point. > > > It seems that Bugzilla does support links, perhaps only by detecting > > text that is http:// but that would be good enough for this. > > > > Something like this could be easily configurable in scmbug using > > something similar to the bugtraq URL scheme. You just specify a > pattern > > like: > > > > http://myserver/viewvc/svn?view=rev&revision=%REVISION% > > > > If the pattern is not specified then you leave out the link from the > > comment. > > > > I realize that this scheme really only works for subversion and not > CVS, > > since CVS doesn't have the global revision number. You could probably > do > > something similar with CVS with a link per file. > > I see what you mean. Yes, this is certainly possible. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kristis Makris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 1:56 AM > > To: Dale King > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [scmbug-users] Add configuration for format of the > > commitmessage added to bug system > > > > Hi Dale, > > > > On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 17:27 -0600, Dale King wrote: > > > The format of the message added to Bugzilla is hardcoded. It needs > to > > > be configurable. Currently it is the log message and a list of files > > > changed. > > > > You are right. I don't think it has become important enough to make it > > configurable yet. > > > > > In our case we will use it to integrate between Subversion and > > > Bugzilla. I would like to have it be the log message and a link to > the > > > revision in the ViewVC browser for the repository, which will itself > > > contain a browsable list of changes. > > > > You are referring to autolinkification: > > > > http://bugzilla.mkgnu.net/show_bug.cgi?id=266 > > > > The main problem is that even if you manually try to customize it now, > > Bugzilla still **will not** setup the url links if you use something > > like <a href="http://some.thing";>Rev 25</a>. This is a security > feature > > that prevents from cross-site scripting. > > > > Bugzilla should be modified to support automatically producing these > > links in comments that match our "integration" format. Their current > > status of this feature is at: > > > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314097#c13 > > > > Perhaps you could help us out here by ... requesting it from Bugzilla > > too ??!! > > > _______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
