I think for CVS, it would make more sense to integrate it into the change list like this:
1.7 --> 1.8 Scmbug:system/doc/manual/about.sgml <http://myserver/viewvc/svn?view=system/doc/manual/about.sgml&revision=1 .8> 1.7 --> 1.8 Scmbug:system/doc/manual/bugtracking-backends.sgml <http://myserver/viewvc/svn?view=system/doc/manual/bugtracking-backends. sgml&revision=1.8> NONE --> 1.1 Scmbug:system/doc/manual/conventions.sgml <http://myserver/viewvc/svn?view=system/doc/manual/conventions.sgml&revi sion=1.1> Note I used the email convention of surrounding the link with <> so the links work even though they wrap across lines. I don't know if Bugzilla supports this or needs this, but is good for when changes to Bugzilla are emailed. But this can all be done using the configuration. This is one of many reasons why CVS should be going away. -----Original Message----- From: Kristis Makris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 12:47 PM To: Dale King Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: [scmbug-users] Add configuration for format ofthecommitmessage added to bug system On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 09:20 -0600, Dale King wrote: > Even better than having configuration for this one feature, just make > the entire message configurable so you can say something like: > > bug-comment-format = > "%LOGMESSAGE% > > http://myserver/viewvc/svn?view=rev&revision=%NEWREV% > > %CHANGES%" > > You can define various tokens than can be used, e.g. %USER%, %DATE%, > %PREVIOUSREV% > > But is this compatible with CVS? Actually how does scmbug work with CVS? > Does it do a separate comment for each file committed? How else do you > know how to group the files into one comment? If it does a separate > comment for each file than perhaps this is still compatible. No, it does a single comment for all files in "the same directory". CVS triggers its hooks per directory. But what you propose is possible for Subversion and CVS. Perhaps you won't supply: bug-comment-format = "%LOGMESSAGE% http://myserver/viewvc/svn?view=rev&revision=%NEWREV% %CHANGES%" but instead supply: bug-comment-format = "%LOGMESSAGE% %CHANGES% %CHANGES_WITH_URL%" bug-comment-viewscm-url="http://myserver/viewvc/svn?view=%FILE%revision= %NEWREV%" since %CHANGES_WITH_URL% will unroll to something like: http://myserver/viewvc/svn?view=system/doc/manual/about.sgml&revision=1. 8 http://myserver/viewvc/svn?view=system/doc/manual/bugtracking-backends.s gml&revision=1.8 http://myserver/viewvc/svn?view=system/doc/manual/conventions.sgml&revis ion=1.1 while %CHANGES% will unroll to: 1.7 --> 1.8 Scmbug:system/doc/manual/about.sgml 1.7 --> 1.8 Scmbug:system/doc/manual/bugtracking-backends.sgml NONE --> 1.1 Scmbug:system/doc/manual/conventions.sgml It's not as visually appealing, but certainly possible. > -----Original Message----- > From: Kristis Makris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 11:01 AM > To: Dale King > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [scmbug-users] Add configuration for format of > thecommitmessage added to bug system > > On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 08:17 -0600, Dale King wrote: > > So you are you saying that Bugzilla does not support putting links at > > all in the comments? That doesn't seem to be true based on the > comments > > that have links in them in the bugs you refer to. > > No. Bugzilla supports putting links. But it will always list links as > "http://..."; Instead of listing them in blue color as "rev 1031". We are > trying to built something more usable and visually appealing. > > This is explained in more detail in: > > http://bugzilla.mkgnu.net/show_bug.cgi?id=266#c5 > > > Or is it that it will not support certain types of links like where > the > > link text is something other than the target. > > > > It seems you are trying to keep the list of file changes and have > parts > > of that text be links. I don't really care about that. I would be more > > than happy with: > > > > This is a log message. Changed the frobnoozle. > > > > http://myserver/viewvc/svn?view=rev&revision=1234 > > > > I don't care if the list of changes is in the comment, you can get > that > > from the link. But you could leave the list; just leave it as plain > > text. > > I see your point. > > > It seems that Bugzilla does support links, perhaps only by detecting > > text that is http:// but that would be good enough for this. > > > > Something like this could be easily configurable in scmbug using > > something similar to the bugtraq URL scheme. You just specify a > pattern > > like: > > > > http://myserver/viewvc/svn?view=rev&revision=%REVISION% > > > > If the pattern is not specified then you leave out the link from the > > comment. > > > > I realize that this scheme really only works for subversion and not > CVS, > > since CVS doesn't have the global revision number. You could probably > do > > something similar with CVS with a link per file. > > I see what you mean. Yes, this is certainly possible. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kristis Makris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 1:56 AM > > To: Dale King > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [scmbug-users] Add configuration for format of the > > commitmessage added to bug system > > > > Hi Dale, > > > > On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 17:27 -0600, Dale King wrote: > > > The format of the message added to Bugzilla is hardcoded. It needs > to > > > be configurable. Currently it is the log message and a list of files > > > changed. > > > > You are right. I don't think it has become important enough to make it > > configurable yet. > > > > > In our case we will use it to integrate between Subversion and > > > Bugzilla. I would like to have it be the log message and a link to > the > > > revision in the ViewVC browser for the repository, which will itself > > > contain a browsable list of changes. > > > > You are referring to autolinkification: > > > > http://bugzilla.mkgnu.net/show_bug.cgi?id=266 > > > > The main problem is that even if you manually try to customize it now, > > Bugzilla still **will not** setup the url links if you use something > > like <a href="http://some.thing";>Rev 25</a>. This is a security > feature > > that prevents from cross-site scripting. > > > > Bugzilla should be modified to support automatically producing these > > links in comments that match our "integration" format. Their current > > status of this feature is at: > > > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314097#c13 > > > > Perhaps you could help us out here by ... requesting it from Bugzilla > > too ??!! > > > _______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
