Hi Gunnar, > The last entry is one month ago. Are they any plans to incorporate it > into a release?
The current patch sent is incomplete, hence I can't incorporate it yet. > > I won't be implementing this, so unless you or someone else commits to > > adding this support and sending patches then there's no timeframe for > > it. > > Does is mean, that Bugzilla support is not a priority anymore? What are > you plans regarding the longer future of SCMBUG? We are about to deploy > a stack based on Bugzilla, Subversion and SCMBUG. However, your last > comment made me worry a bit if our selection will be supported in the > future. I understand your concern. I'm confident that the project is here to stay. Personally, "Bugzilla support" is a priority, but "Bugzilla 3.0 support" is not. My personal priority at the moment is to fix bugs. When someone steps up and contributes a patch for Bugzilla 3.0 backend support I'll join in and help finish off the patch, test, etc. But I can't go out and implement all 40 requested features right now on the todo list "just because people want them". Perhaps later (after the summer) I'll be able to change my personal priorities. But I cannot do that right now. I am investigating options for allocating more time to this project. How does that sound ? Fair ?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
