On Nov 14, 2007 11:16 AM, Kristis Makris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Unannotated tags don't make a proper new object, only a ref. If you > > stick to annotated tags, you'll get new objects added which, I think, > > should trigger the post-commit hook. > > I just tried again tagging with both: > > $ git tag TAG_NAME > > $ git tag -a TAG_NAME > > and I don't get the post-commit hook executed. > > Perhaps I missed something ?
Okay, I don't know about that. Someone else might want to weigh in on this. > > If you have the new commit's SHA-1, it's very simple to get the parent > > commit's SHA-1 and do whatever you want. A complexity would be with > > handling merges, where a commit has multiple parents. If you have a > > commit SHA-1 hash, you can just "git diff --name-only <hash>^ <hash>" > > to get a list of the files changed by <hash>. > > This sounds great. If the post-commit hook could now provide the new > commit SHA-1 hash than that should be what I need. > > Can the new commit SHA-1 hash be added as a parameter to the post-commit > hook please ? Sure -- I've got a patch for it that I'll send shortly. It's using the existing shell git-commit, so might be suitable for maint; I haven't followed what's happened with the builtinification of git-commit. Dave. _______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
