On Nov 14, 2007 12:55 PM, Kristis Makris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It isn't a centralized bug-tracking system necessarily. Because
> different developers may used different, custom bug-tracking systems,
> with custom hooks in their own local Git repositories that integrate
> with only their own bug-tracking systems. And perhaps we can add the
> support in the Scmbug Git frontend to integrate with a centralized
> bug-tracker only on push operations if desired.

I disagree somewhat here. In git, local commits are extremely
lightweight, and as a developer I don't want anything remarkable to
happen on those, even locally. It's pushing (which is actually
publishing!) that makes those commits relevant.

Even if I have a local or distributed bugtracker, any purely local
commit is "draft".

And this is regardless of centralised or distributed -- that's a
matter of policy around the repo I'm pushing to. The distinction that
matters is local vs published. Local commits get removed, rebased,
redone, discarded a whole lot.

> But we can't explore any of these issues, discussed in the thread below
> too, unless we can extract what's needed from the hooks.

I concur with the chorus that chants "HEAD"... try with `git show
HEAD` for starters...

cheers,


martin
_______________________________________________
scmbug-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users

Reply via email to