On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 12:46 -0400, Drew Marold wrote: > No, I've already beat them into submission on that one. A while back I > got sick of blank checkin comments and instituted a 3 word/15 char > minimum. There's was grumbling but everyone eventually accepted it. I > was more thinking of getting them to conform to the format that makes > the integration activity happen. There's a lot of non-bug related > activity, so I can't require a bug id on every checkin.
I would disagree with that. I would define "non-bug related activity" as activity that hasn't been given enough attention and absolutely needs a bug created for it. But is a matter of personal philosophy. I'd be against the "optional" presence_of_bug_ids policy.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
