Kristis Makris wrote: > On Sat, 2008-09-27 at 21:03 -0400, Matt Adams wrote: > >> in Bugzilla but this is where my problem arises. After we are finished >> with development branches we usually delete them from HEAD. If I try to > > How would you feel about not deleting them ? > > If you filed bugs against them, why would you choose to erase that > traceability you have in your issue-tracker ?
Just realized that the scmbug Bugzilla is closed to outsiders :-) Thanks guys for your comments. We ended up with a policy where tagged releases & development build branches are NEVER removed (unless they were created in error, in which case there won't usually be any bugs assigned to them). Development branches (which are usually merged back into trunk or discarded altogether) MAY be removed but only if the (CLOSED) bugs that are assigned to that particular branch/version are reassigned to the versions to into which those bugs were merged. Same goes for private developer tags. There is clearly nothing revolutionary here; I guess I just needed a kick to get myself out of thinking that this was a problem. Thanks! (In reply to comment #1) > Since what version the deletion of versions in Bugzilla is > implemented? I use a pretty old version, 0.19.7, and didn't come > across this "issue", although I sometimes work the same way. 0.26.9 -- Matt Adams Development & Network Services Cypress Interactive http://cypressinteractive.com, http://edsuite.com _______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
