Oh, sorry. I would want this for WebSVN as well. tsahi
-- The day Micro$oft sells something that doesn't SUCK is the day they start selling vacuum cleaners. http://tsahiasher.co.il ----- Original Message ---- > From: Kristis Makris <[email protected]> > To: Thorsten Schöning <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Sent: Tue, December 22, 2009 8:43:32 PM > Subject: [scmbug-users] Which systems should autolinkification support ? > > > > If your patches consider just changing templates it sounds good. > > Changing templates is definitely the way to go. No doubt about it. > > > Is there any bug tracker > > supported by SCMBug which doesn't have a flexible template engine and > > doesn't support customizing those? > > I am not sure if there are any, but from a patching stand-point we would > have to prepare a patch either way. The patch would either be against > the templates, or the core; it's up to the bug-tracker to be more > maintainable for upgrades. > > > Maybe the first thing to do is get a list of people who are > > interested in autolinkification, or already use it, and which software > > they use as bugtracker and repository viewer? This way we get an idea > > which software combinations need patches of the used bugtracker core, > > which just need template changes etc. > > That's a great idea. > > > I use WebSVN 2.1 and Bugzilla 2.22.x and autolinkification is working > > with template changes. > > I use ViewVC; I need autolinkification for both CVS and Subversion, > using Bugzilla 2.20 and 3.0. > > Anyone else ? What would you like to use ? _______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
