On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Tom Tanner (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON)
<[email protected]> wrote:
> But thats referring to $( $) not ${ $}. I think it'd be wrong to put the
> sources in the signature calculation as they are probably already in the
> dependencies, but I don't know if it does or doesn't
Bill's right. ${...$} does variable substitution, just like $FOO.
The result of that substitution goes into the signature. Everything
except what's in $(...$) goes in.
--
Gary
_______________________________________________
Scons-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
