Tom,

If order of your sources is important then it's important to store it in the 
signature.
If not, then it probably isn't.

-Bill
On Sep 21, 2012, at 9:11 AM, Tom Tanner (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> So if you ${SOURCES} the names of all the sources go in the signature 
> calculation? even though they're already dependencies anyway? So I should 
> really do $( ${SOURCES} $) in my situation?
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: [email protected]
> To: TOM TANNER (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON), [email protected]
> At: Sep 21 2012 13:11:18
> 
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Tom Tanner (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON)
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> But thats referring to $( $) not ${ $}. I think it'd be wrong to put the 
>> sources in the signature calculation as they are probably already in the 
>> dependencies, but I don't know if it does or doesn't
> 
> Bill's right.  ${...$} does variable substitution, just like $FOO.
> The result of that substitution goes into the signature.  Everything
> except what's in $(...$) goes in.
> 
> -- 
> Gary
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

_______________________________________________
Scons-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

Reply via email to