On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Gary Oberbrunner <[email protected]> wrote: > Now that we've all been living with hg for a while, what are people's > opinions on hg vs. git for SCons? I'll admit I'm much deeper into git these > days and I think overall it's a better system. But I'm interested in what > you all think. We could switch pretty easily if there was enough interest, > or we could just stay with hg and get on with life. :-)
My choice is mostly dictated by language. If I used Git, I probably used CMake or premake. The only advantage of Git I see is GitHub. Otherwise both are on par. Git has logical feature branches and dumb repeated add/commit commands. Mercurial screws feature branches concept, but MQs are awesome. So -1, as will require migrating to GitHub and we still haven't done anything awesome since last migration. =/ _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
