Anatoly, On Sep 29, 2013, at 12:19 PM, anatoly techtonik <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Gary Oberbrunner <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Now that we've all been living with hg for a while, what are people's >> opinions on hg vs. git for SCons? I'll admit I'm much deeper into git these >> days and I think overall it's a better system. But I'm interested in what >> you all think. We could switch pretty easily if there was enough interest, >> or we could just stay with hg and get on with life. :-) > > My choice is mostly dictated by language. If I used Git, I probably > used CMake or premake. The only advantage of Git I see is GitHub. > Otherwise both are on par. Git has logical feature branches and dumb > repeated add/commit commands. Mercurial screws feature branches > concept, but MQs are awesome. > > So -1, as will require migrating to GitHub and we still haven't done > anything awesome since last migration. =/ Switching to git would not require switching to github. Bitbucket.org has supported git for quite some time. -Bill _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
