On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Dirk Bächle <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05.07.2014 09:20, anatoly techtonik wrote: >> >> Because nobody from developers objected, I already sent request to >> botbot.me, even though I didn't tick the [ ] op mark. Another reason >> for me to pushing on op is to increase the bus factor on the channel. > > I understand your intentions behind this request, and value all your efforts > to drive this item forward. But I, personally, don't like the way you're > "hammering" this through.
My "vacation" will end soon, and I am just trying to complete as much things as possible. > As Bill hinted at, this is a somewhat sensitive topic because recording of > what other people say and write actually touches part of their private > sphere. That's why Freenode requires that if logging is enabled, it should be present in channel topic - https://freenode.net/channel_guidelines.shtml And that's why smb. needs to be an op to set this rule. > So it would be a good idea to ask the developer community *and* give > it some time to answer first, before leaping ahead and "just doing it". > You probably missed the point with the "private sphere" a little, which is > okay because it can happen to anyone of us. But this also makes clear how > important it is to ask and get other people's opinions first, instead of > saying "I'll do this now. Stop me if you can.". Well, there were two weeks. What communication period should we agree with? > In the first case you're a valid part of the community, in the latter you're > doing things alone. To be part of community is not a goal, but a burden. =) _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
