On 12.12.2014 01:47, Bill Deegan wrote:
Dirk,

Trying to figure out a way we can avoid the spam problem we've had so far.

Yes, I know and I'm not against it. Many thanks to you and Gary for caring to find an alternative. No matter what the final technical solution will look like, I'll definitely support it. I just wanted to point out that we're raising the barriers for the "occasional newcomer" and commenters. We do have a lot of stuff in the Wiki that's well worked out and mature enough to get served statically, complementing the UserGuide for example. But it would be good to still have a place for collecting ideas, snippets, organizing things...where people can "go nuts" if they have to. And that's what fits perfectly to a Wiki, in my opinion. We want new people and their ideas and writings coming in, not having to push them out ourselves...so we need to have low barriers for that.

What about having a two stage thing, with a Wiki for collecting ideas 'n' stuff, and then statically served pages, protected by a VCS as well? A little bit like core tools vs. external ones? If we like a contribution, we'll pull it in?

Finally, if we could find a Wiki, with something like the ApprovalQueue we had before, on a server that's less vulnerable to DOS attacks...that would be my favorite. Being robust against DOS is more important to me than the spam filtering/preventing issue. I don't care about the Wiki dialect so much, and I also think that the default rendering of Bitbucket looks quite okay.

Dirk

_______________________________________________
Scons-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

Reply via email to