I think we just need hosting with better protection. On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Dirk Bächle <[email protected]> wrote: > Bill, > > > On 12.12.2014 00:52, Bill Deegan wrote: > > I'm thinking a hg repo and some sort of ci to process it when new changes > come in. > Or use readthedocs.org (It has integration with bitbucket for such already) > > That way users and do pull requests and also the webserver only has to > handle serving static pages. > > Is it reasonable to expect that users who wanted to contribute to wiki-like > content could handle mercurial? > > it's probably not so much about hg (or any other tool, for that matter), but > about the workflow that's required for getting one's changes in. To me it > feels like we're moving away from a more "scratchpad"-like medium, to static > pages. That would be okay if we had several authors and technical writers > that could create lots of pages with content. But this would mean that we > provide all the information, and we are responsible for keeping things > alive. > If that's what we want, fine. > It more or less boils down to the question: Do we want a Wiki (static pages) > for us, or for our users? > > Just some late night thoughts, to fuel the discussion... > > Regards, > > Dirk > > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >
-- anatoly t. _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
