Per, In general we like to add a new test per failure. The fixture setup should make it easier to construct one.
-Bill On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Per Nordlöw <[email protected]> wrote: > Isn't there already existing test for this that can be extend? > > Hälsningar, > Per Nordlöw > > 2015-02-22 1:06 GMT+01:00 Bill Deegan <[email protected]>: > >> Russel, >> >> You're our resident D expert. Does that seem reasonable to you? >> >> Per - Any chance you can work up a testcase to test for what's being >> fixed? SCons development has a test requirement for most patches. >> See here: http://www.scons.org/wiki/DeveloperGuide/TestingMethodology >> >> Thanks, >> Bill >> >> On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Russel Winder <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28647348/faulty-d-dependency-logic-in-scons >>> >>> -- >>> Russel. >>> >>> ============================================================================= >>> Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: >>> sip:[email protected] >>> 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] >>> London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Scons-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
