Per, I don't know much about D.
Would a file with only: import IMPORT_PATH : SYMBOL; Be a legal D file and compile? And then some minimal file with SYMBOL in it at IMPORT_PATH? -Bill On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Bill Deegan <b...@baddogconsulting.com> wrote: > Per, > > In general we like to add a new test per failure. > The fixture setup should make it easier to construct one. > > -Bill > > On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Per Nordlöw <per.nord...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Isn't there already existing test for this that can be extend? >> >> Hälsningar, >> Per Nordlöw >> >> 2015-02-22 1:06 GMT+01:00 Bill Deegan <b...@baddogconsulting.com>: >> >>> Russel, >>> >>> You're our resident D expert. Does that seem reasonable to you? >>> >>> Per - Any chance you can work up a testcase to test for what's being >>> fixed? SCons development has a test requirement for most patches. >>> See here: http://www.scons.org/wiki/DeveloperGuide/TestingMethodology >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Bill >>> >>> On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Russel Winder <rus...@winder.org.uk> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28647348/faulty-d-dependency-logic-in-scons >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Russel. >>>> >>>> ============================================================================= >>>> Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: >>>> sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net >>>> 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk >>>> London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Scons-dev mailing list >>>> Scons-dev@scons.org >>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
