Oh, ok. 
Thanks for the explanation. 
Forget my previous comment, then :-)

--
Alexandre

> Le 3 avr. 2015 à 18:28, Kenny, Jason L <jason.l.ke...@intel.com> a écrit :
> 
> The current way is to get a source dist and install it.
> This would not stop. You would be able to do the same thing.
>  
> The difference in the below would be:
>  
> Pip install scons
>  
> would be default go to the internet and get SCons
>  
> pip install .
>  
> would install the current setup.py in the directory ( and I should add allow 
> you to then do a “pip uninstall scons” to remove it. You can still do a 
> “python setup.py install” as well you however would now have meta generated 
> to remove it with a nice command.
>  
> Honestly the current model would work as is, making it work with pip just 
> means we have more functional options to provide.
>  
> Jason
>  
>  
> From: Scons-dev [mailto:scons-dev-boun...@scons.org] On Behalf Of Alexandre 
> Feblot
> Sent: Friday, April 3, 2015 4:45 AM
> To: SCons developer list
> Subject: Re: [Scons-dev] Packaging logic?
>  
> Hi,
> On environments where  there is no internet access (banks, army, ...), or if 
> scons needs to be internally patched before being installed, the current way 
> is much easier than using pip, I guess. 
> 
> --
> Alexandre
> 
> Le 2 avr. 2015 à 22:33, Bill Deegan <b...@baddogconsulting.com> a écrit :
> 
> Anatoly,
>  
> On non-windows platforms the current recommendation is download the .tgz, 
> unpack, python setup.py it.
>  
> That is certainly more complicated than:
>  
> pip install scons.
>  
>  
> -Bill
>  
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 5:43 AM, anatoly techtonik <techto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Bill Deegan <b...@baddogconsulting.com> wrote:
> Jason,
> 
> I'm in agreement.
> I think it would be great if the primary way for users to install SCons was 
> via pip (and virtualenv if they like, which I do).
>  
> This is a can of worms IMO. SCons is not tool for Python programmers, so if 
> you do that, you will require people to learn about Python packaging, which 
> is an unnecessary hell. If the tools is needed by Python programmers, then 
> plz. state how exactly.
> 
> Put the real world need first - what are you trying to achieve with that, 
> excluding the "consistency with Python world"?
> 
> The primary function and the way of using SCons for me (and my vision for 
> everybody else) is to be a build tool that can be put into source repository, 
> so that you can directly build after checkout without messing with 
> "apt-get/yum/pip install ..." and friends.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev@scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev@scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev@scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
_______________________________________________
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

Reply via email to