Oh!!! I think that did goodness. Maybe we need to update the tool to complain about using deprecated lxml.
Here is a new diff blurb: > diff -r eba2d423ec1b doc/generated/tools.gen > --- a/doc/generated/tools.gen Mon Jun 29 16:12:02 2015 -0400 > +++ b/doc/generated/tools.gen Mon Jun 29 22:56:44 2015 -0400 > @@ -772,6 +772,14 @@ > </para> > <para>Sets: &cv-link-AS;, &cv-link-ASCOM;, &cv-link-ASFLAGS;, > &cv-link-ASPPCOM;, &cv-link-ASPPFLAGS;.</para><p > ara>Uses: &cv-link-ASCOMSTR;, &cv-link-ASPPCOMSTR;.</para></listitem> > </varlistentry> > + <varlistentry id="t-Packaging"> > + <term>Packaging</term> > + <listitem> > +<para xmlns="http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0";> > +Sets construction variables for the <function xmlns=" > http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0";>Package</function> Builde > r. > +</para> > +</listitem> > + </varlistentry> > <varlistentry id="t-packaging"> > <term>packaging</term> > <listitem> > @@ -780,14 +788,6 @@ > </para> > </listitem> > </varlistentry> > - <varlistentry id="t-Packaging"> > - <term>Packaging</term> > - <listitem> > -<para xmlns="http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0";> > -Sets construction variables for the <function xmlns=" > http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0";>Package</function> Builde > r. > -</para> > -</listitem> > - </varlistentry> > <varlistentry id="t-pdf"> > <term>pdf</term> > <listitem> > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:08 AM, William Blevins <[email protected]> wrote: > Apparently, there are also the following packages which are not installed: > libxslt-devel.x86_64 > libxslt-python.x86_64 > > The python package may be the culprit... > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:58 PM, William Blevins <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Sorry I meant to include this entry also: libxslt-1.1.28-5.el7.x86_64 >> >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Bill Deegan <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> William, >>> >>> Do you have libxslt installed? >>> >>> -Bill >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 8:32 PM, William Blevins <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Sorry for the delay, >>>> >>>> I have these packages installed which cannot be YUM erased because YUM >>>> itself depends on said packages: >>>> libxml2-python-2.9.1-5.el7_1.2.x86_64 >>>> libxml2-2.9.1-5.el7_1.2.x86_64 >>>> libxml2-devel-2.9.1-5.el7_1.2.x86_64 >>>> libxml2-static-2.9.1-5.el7_1.2.x86_64 >>>> >>>> I also have package which I could erase though not without breaking >>>> some applications (since reinstalled): >>>> python-lxml-3.2.1-4.el7.x86_64 >>>> >>>> With lxml uninstalled, I could not run "bin/docs-update-generated.py" >>>> due to error: >>>> >>>>> $ python bin/docs-update-generated.py >>>>> Traceback (most recent call last): >>>>> File "bin/docs-update-generated.py", line 11, in <module> >>>>> import SConsDoc >>>>> File "/home/wblevins/BitBucket/scons_cl/bin/SConsDoc.py", line 130, >>>>> in <module> >>>>> raise ImportError("Failed to import either libxml2/libxslt or >>>>> lxml") >>>>> ImportError: Failed to import either libxml2/libxslt or lxml >>>>> >>>> >>>> Is the issue perhaps that the scripts are not finding libxml2 in the >>>> PYTHONPATH? >>>> >>>> V/R, >>>> William >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:54 AM, William Blevins < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I will check if I have libxslt installed tonight (ETA: ~8hrs). I will >>>>> try using a single toolchain at a time (if yum/rpm will allow), and see if >>>>> that makes a difference. >>>>> >>>>> V/R, >>>>> William >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Bill Deegan < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> From the code I've looked at if you have libxml2 & libxslt that is >>>>>> preferred, and then if not it will use lxml. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Bill >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 8:32 AM, William Blevins < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I have both lxml and libxml2 installed. Not sure about the other. >>>>>>> Which tool takes priority? >>>>>>> On Jul 30, 2015 11:24 AM, "Bill Deegan" <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dirk, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A thought. >>>>>>>> Is your system setup with libxml2/libxslt and mine set up with lxml >>>>>>>> perhaps? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Bill >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Dirk Bächle <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hey guys, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 30.07.2015 05:40, Bill Deegan wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Dirk & all, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> New output.. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> please grant me another day to review...sorry, but it's a >>>>>>>>> different timezone here and I'm a little swamped by some real-life >>>>>>>>> events >>>>>>>>> and problems at the moment. ;) Nothing serious though, it's all >>>>>>>>> good... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Dirk >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Scons-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Scons-dev mailing list >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Scons-dev mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Scons-dev mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Scons-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Scons-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
