Dirk, I had lxslt installed but not python-lxslt. Once that was installed it was obvious that it switched from lxml to lxml2 usage. I still got another error. On Jul 31, 2015 3:18 AM, "Dirk Bächle" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Bill, > > On 30.07.2015 17:36, Bill Deegan wrote: > >> From the code I've looked at if you have libxml2 & libxslt that is >> preferred, and then if not it will use lxml. >> >> > your assumption is correct, this is done because libxml2 is faster in > general. > > It seems that libxml2 and pure lxml have different behaviour regarding > "normalizing namespaces" and that's where the diff comes from. This makes > at least the validation in the SernaFree XML editor choke for the lxml > output...:( > > I'm investigating this a little further and will try to find a way around > this. I'd really like to have the (almost) same output for both XML > toolchains, such that it gets accepted by most XML editors out there. > > @William: You said that after installing an additional package the > processing got faster and correct? My guess would be that you now have a > lxml distro/package that relies on libxml2 under the hood. This makes the > error go away of course... > > > I'll keep you posted, best regards, > > Dirk > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
