2.7 or 2.7.0 ? On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 7:39 AM, William Blevins <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Russel Winder <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 13:23 -0700, Ivan Van Laningham wrote: >> > Hi All-- >> > The trouble with requiring a minimum of 2.7.x on all platforms is >> > that it >> > would be problematic for people on CentOS, Redhat and related distros >> > earlier than say, CentOS 7. 7 has 2.7, but 6 has 2.6 (and not the >> > latest >> > version, either). Anyone who wanted to use CentOS 6 would have to >> > install >> > Python 2.7.x to use Scons. Might not want to do it, or would go with >> > an >> > earlier version. >> >> Of course,… >> >> CentOS, RHEL, Scientific Linux, etc. don't come with SCons so it has to >> be installed. Is it a hardship to have to install a version of Python >> as well as SCons? Not really, especially on these systems. Although the >> main repository doesn't have Python 3 necessarily, there are "add on" >> repositories for these distributions that certainly do. So it is just >> package management, unlike for SCons :-) >> >> > Debian 8 is also Python 2.7 > > >> >> >> >> -- >> Russel. >> >> ============================================================================= >> Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: >> sip:[email protected] >> 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] >> London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Scons-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
