Simply put there are many more integrations with github than there are for bitbucket. Thus the drive to move there. Also many developers already have github accounts but not bitbucket. I don't see any value in staying on bitbucket if we're moving to git...
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Jason Kenny <[email protected]> wrote: > I think this is two different things > > Github vs bitbucket > > Git vs hg > > I think a better argument is moving to git from hg. This is an easier > argument to make than trying to change two things. > > Jason > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scons-dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gaurav > Juvekar > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 1:54 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Scons-dev] SCons performance investigations > > On 2017-07-27 21:27, Bill Deegan wrote: > > > Post 3.0 - Migrate to GitHub > > Do you have any major challenges that could affect this right now? > Migrating to GitHub might bring in more contributors, since hg is a > significant learning curve to newcomers. Does this involve migrating the > bug tracker to GitHub issues also? > > -- > Regards, > Gaurav Juvekar > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
