Thanks for the clarification Jason
From: Scons-dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill Deegan Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 3:35 PM To: SCons developer list <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Scons-dev] SCons performance investigations Simply put there are many more integrations with github than there are for bitbucket. Thus the drive to move there. Also many developers already have github accounts but not bitbucket. I don't see any value in staying on bitbucket if we're moving to git... On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Jason Kenny <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I think this is two different things Github vs bitbucket Git vs hg I think a better argument is moving to git from hg. This is an easier argument to make than trying to change two things. Jason -----Original Message----- From: Scons-dev [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Gaurav Juvekar Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 1:54 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Scons-dev] SCons performance investigations On 2017-07-27 21:27, Bill Deegan wrote: > Post 3.0 - Migrate to GitHub Do you have any major challenges that could affect this right now? Migrating to GitHub might bring in more contributors, since hg is a significant learning curve to newcomers. Does this involve migrating the bug tracker to GitHub issues also? -- Regards, Gaurav Juvekar _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
