David writes:

| I always wonder whether instruments have changed, or artists just
| couldn't draw them. I think the MOMI website (Museum of Musical
| Instruments) has some examples of the ambiguity of f-hole shapes, body
| lengths etc in old woodcuts.


In some historical circles, looking for "howlers" in  artistic  works
is  an  ongoing  game.  Artists historically have often been somewhat
contemptuous of mere technical detail, and often painted things  that
are  physically  absurd or impossible.  Musical instruments are among
the most common examples, especially stringed instruments.  I've seen
any  number  of  drawing  or  paintings of stringed instruments whose
necks were at an angle to the top of the body, so  that  the  strings
would  have  to  bend  at  the  junction.  For a more subtle one, you
sometimes see bows drawn at an angle  to  the  string.   But  players
always  learn  that the bow must be at a right angle to the string to
get a good sound.  Such things have nothing to do  with  the  musical
culture or tradition; they're a matter of basic physics.

So you can't trust artistic representations of  musical  instruments,
unless you know that the specific artist was up to the task.

Posted to Scots-L - The Traditional Scottish Music & Culture List - To 
subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html

Reply via email to