There was a mention of this fiasco on the BBC2 program Working Lunch
earlier this week. I got the impression that only about 30 people had
placed orders while the *erroneous* (per Kodak's claim) price was shown.
Now, how on earth it can it possibly be in Kodak's best interests to
pursue their current course of action? Swallowing a loss of �6,000 for an
end to this, and avoiding all this damaging publicity, would seem to be a
pretty cheap way out of it for them.
Apologies in advance if this email looks bad when it hits the list - I
ammm using a notes client for email, and an curious to see what it looks
like! :)
===========================================================
Graeme Chambers Tel (01355) 905132 or 07866 260880
Download Systems Ltd Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===========================================================
"Gordon JC Pearce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/01/02 13:05
Please respond to scottish
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Re: [scottish] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Shop@Kodak DX3700
Digital
Camera]
> Hmm, just got a mail from kodak...
>
Just spotted this on theregister
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/23/23608.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.lug.org.uk http://www.linuxportal.co.uk
http://www.linuxjob.co.uk http://www.linuxshop.co.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.lug.org.uk http://www.linuxportal.co.uk
http://www.linuxjob.co.uk http://www.linuxshop.co.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------------
