On 2002.02.28 17:16 "Ian Drake, IT, SE Dunbartonshire" wrote:
> Is it just me... or are they both exactly the same?
Ahem. Sorry, if you look back at the previous mail, it is wrong.
Nevertheless, not happy with looking a total fool for posting the wrong version first
time, I increased my incompetence rating by editing the first sig, in situ, then
correcting my corrected version. (or something like that. The meeting is not long over
and .. well, you can guess:-) )
While I don't recommend anyone run arbitrary source from the internet, I believe both
versions are safe. No formatting of disks or deletion or anything like that, but all
disclaimers apply anyway.
/me reaches for the anadin ;-) # in joke from #[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > --
> > perl
> -e'map{$:=$"x64;substr$:,sin(++$a/8)*32+32,=chr$_+22;print$:,$/;select$.,$.,
> $.,.1}("6177899454634910"x7)=~/../g'
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
The previous one read
perl
-e'map{$:=$"x64;substr$:,sin(++$a/8)<<5+32,=chr$_+22;print$:,$/;select$.,$.,$.,.1}("6177899454634910"x7)=~/../g'
which is nowhere near so sexy :-)
> >
>
> That sig should of course read,
>
> perl
> -e'map{$:=$"x64;substr$:,sin(++$a/8)*32+32,=chr$_+22;print$:,$/;select$.,$.,
> $.,.1}("6177899454634910"x7)=~/../g'
>
> otherwise it will not format the disk, just erase all the files. :-)
>
cheers
Lawrence
--------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.lug.org.uk http://www.linuxportal.co.uk
http://www.linuxjob.co.uk http://www.linuxshop.co.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------------
