Craig Bradney wrote: > On Wednesday 01 December 2004 14:40, Alexander Skwar wrote: >> Craig Bradney wrote: >> > My question is more why are you seeing this issue and I am not at all. >> >> Well, you saw the issue as well - with 6.0. You didn't see >> the issue with 5.0 on Linux, because that's not the same >> version I used - I used 5.0 on Window.s > > Err, no, I never saw the issue on Acroreader 6.0.
Yes, you did :) Message-ID: <200412011040.33896.cbradney at zip.com.au> | The PC had never seen the PDF before, doesnt have the fonts, and it showed | the ugliness for maybe half a second before looking 100% correct That's the same issue I saw with 6.0 as well. And it's - basically - the same issue, that 5.0 has as well, I suppose. 5.0, however, doesn't seem to refresh its canvas once it has loaded the fonts. > explanation almost covers it. I have one issue though. You said you reduced > the number of fonts and it didnt make any difference to the speed? Yep. > That would > be very strange if the PDF size and location of fonts within it were the > issue. You should see a speedup if its smaller, only logical. That's what I supposed as well. > Somethings > weird. Yes. That form's weird :) > Any issues in the webserver logs for that access? No. Alexander Skwar -- Leela: Ah, maybe they're right, maybe Nibbler is dumb. Fry: Don't listen to them, Leela. People said I was dumb but I proved them! -------------------------------------------------------------------------
