On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 16:53:30 +0100, Alexander Skwar <listen at alexander.skwar.name> wrote: > > > Craig Bradney wrote: > > > On Wednesday 01 December 2004 15:40, Alexander Skwar wrote: > >> Craig Bradney wrote: > >> > On Wednesday 01 December 2004 14:40, Alexander Skwar wrote: > >> >> Craig Bradney wrote: > >> >> > My question is more why are you seeing this issue and I am not at all. > >> >> > >> >> Well, you saw the issue as well - with 6.0. You didn't see > >> >> the issue with 5.0 on Linux, because that's not the same > >> >> version I used - I used 5.0 on Window.s > >> > > >> > Err, no, I never saw the issue on Acroreader 6.0. > >> > >> Yes, you did :) > > > > I consider a .5s time to load the fonts perfectly reasonable though. > > I don't - especially since other PDF forms don't show this behaviour. > > > > >> > That would > >> > be very strange if the PDF size and location of fonts within it were the > >> > issue. You should see a speedup if its smaller, only logical. > >> > >> That's what I supposed as well. > > > > Tried the vector version? > > Hm? You mean, when I select "yes" in Settings -> Fonts? > > Ugly and slow as hell: > > http://stuff.alexander.skwar.name/Scribus/Account_Request_v2.1_-_Vectorized.pdf > Also pdfopt doesn't make that much better: > http://stuff.alexander.skwar.name/Scribus/Account_Request_v2.1_-_Vectorized_-_pdfopt_optimized.pdf >
I have no problems with these 2 documents here. Fonts look fine both with acroread plugin and standalone (Acroread 5.09 Linux). And documents both load very fast (text drawn first, then table borders). Fred
