Good Morning, Re:
>Paul wrote: >[a HUGE post containing an entire digest, quoted and unsnipped ] >If you're reading in digest mode please create a new message to the list >rather than replying to the digest, or trim the quoted text. Ooops, sorry. 2. Re: Editing Text in Text Box (John Beardmore) > 3. Re: Editing Text in Text Box (Craig Ringer) > Could you briefly explain what you are talking about here? >:) I thought I had. What specifically didn't you understand ? I just find the ergonomics a bit clunky because response > isn't rapid, and mouse click events in particular sometimes seem to be > missed. I suspect I spend a significant proportion of my time waiting > to see if the highlighting of mouse click I made had the effect desired. Craig Ringer writes: >Performance degrades non-linearly with the amount of text in a linked >series of text frames and with how many text frames are involved. It's >quite usable initially, but gets seriously slow once you have too much >text. How much "too much" is varies depending on how fast your machine >is, the Scribus version you are using, etc. I think that this answers my question. Right now my file size is quite small, and likely this is the reason I'm not having any problem with editing text. Neither do I anticipate having large files, for now, as the structure/design of my 'newsletter' won't require it. But I'll keep an eye on it as things develop. Thanks to all for the responses. Paul -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.scribus.info/pipermail/scribus/attachments/20080505/c651a66d/attachment.htm
