On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:49 PM, JLuc <jluc at no-log.org> wrote: > Jessica said : >> ...it is disorienting. ?Not having that visual feedback ... > > Jeffrey Silverman a ?crit : >> >> This is a "me too" for all of these improvement/feature request/bugfix >> ideas. > > With this and other Jessicas mail, I recognise my early experiences too... > :-( > > All these are little tiny uninteresting problems > compared to the developpement of more ambitious technical features, > but they make Scribus somehow disappointing for common use. > JL
Yeah, for real. Scribus is great for what it is, but imagine: version 1.2 didn't even have a working "undo" feature. I remember thinking, at the time, Scribus is sucky for reasons like that and finding nothing but blogs about how awesome Scribus is/was. No undo feature??!? That is like, a ca1993 feature, people. Anyways, I do find Scribus awesome[1] now. So don't think this is a derogatory flame/troll post. And don't take it personally, devs, although speaking as a dev[5], believe me, I know how hard that is. [1] For certain given values of "awesome". Maybe not "go blind be exposure to sheer awesomensess[2]" awesome. [2] Love that movie[3] [3] What movie? Kungfu Panda, duh[4] [4] I just like footnotes [5] Not of Scribus, sorry. Another big open source project though :) -- JDS
