Dnia 13-12-2010 o godz. 10:42 Jim Ford napisa?(a): > >>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/846025/test01.sla > >>> > >>> and get a PDF like this: > >>> > >>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/846025/test01.pdf > >>> > >>> Very neat. > >> > >> But it won't look neat if it's spread across the centre pages, because > >> of the region where the image is duplicated! > > > > Well, it's either this, or a white gap between two parts of the image. > > The duplicated part is lost in the binding area, remember? > > But if the image is spread across the two center pages, there is no > binding area.
As I understand it, it depends on the kind of binding you use. If you have a true centerfold e.g. in a magazine bound with staples , then you're right. If, however, you have a thermal/glue binding -- think "National Geographic" -- there will be an area in the very center that will not be visible due to the binding. You can then define both a slightly wider inner margin to get correct page proportions, and an inner BLEED to achieve what you see in the files above: the image contents are duplicated to compensate for the area that is not visible after opening the pages because of the binding. GS -- Grzegorz Staniak, gstaniak _at_ wp *dot* pl
