On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 21:00:58 -0600 Mike Sleger <chappa-ai at q.com> wrote:
> > On Sep 30, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Mike Sleger wrote: > > > On Sep 30, 2011, at 11:56 AM, john Culleton wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:25:47 -0400 > >> Oleksandr Moskalenko <malex at scribus.net> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> On Sep 30, 2011, at 1:17 PM, john Culleton wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Now why doesn't the download page say that more clearly? I don't > >>>> have a good answer. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> John Culleton > >>>> Wexford Press > >>>> "Create Book Covers with Scribus" > >>>> http://www.booklocker.com/books/4055.html > >>> > >>> John, > >>> > >>> I updated the information on the Download page at > >>> http://wiki.scribus.net/canvas/Download. Please check it out and > >>> leave your comments. > >> > >> Exactly put. Now I hope newcomers will heed the message! > >> > >> I would rearrange the page somewhat, putting the pointers to > >> 1.4.0rc together and right under the 1.3.3.14 download pointers. > >> This means putting the 1.4.0 svn and the 1.4.0 tarball right under > >> "Read instructions for Debian/Ubuntu Linux Package archive access." > >> > >> The overall page sequence would be: > >> All the 1.3.3.14 stuff > >> All the 1.4.0 stuff > >> All the 1.5.0 stuff > > > > I would arrange the versions so the latest ones are at the top of > > the list and the newer ones at the bottom. You want the latest > > information to be the first links a user sees. > > > > My bad - I was in a hurry. The newest versions should be at the top > of the list, and the older versions should be lowest on the list. > People shouldn't have to look around for the latest version to > download - it should be the first download link they see. If you mean to put 1.4.0 at the top I agree. But I would not put the development version 1.5.0 at the top. -- John Culleton Wexford Press "Create Book Covers with Scribus" http://www.booklocker.com/books/4055.html
